The Reeler

Recent Comments


A Girl and a Gun
Ain't It Cool News
Alliance of Women Film Journalists
Anne Thompson
Art Fag City
Better Than Fudge
Big Picture Big Sound
Bitter Cinema
Blank Screen
Brian Flemming
Bright Lights
Celluloid Eyes
Chutry Experiment, The
Cinema Confidential
Cinema Eye
Coming Soon
Cool Cinema Trash
Cyndi Greening
Dark Horizons
Drew's Blog-O-Rama
Esoteric Rabbit
Film Detail
Film Experience, The
Film Journal, The
Film Journey
Film Stew
Film Rotation
GreenCine Daily
Hacking Netflix
Hammer to Nail
High Sign, The
Hollywood Elsewhere
House Next Door, The
IFC Blog, The
In the Company of Glenn
IndieScene Movie Marketing Blog
indieWIRE Blogs
Jay's Movie Blog
JoBlo's Movie Emporium
Kaiju Shakedown
Like Anna Karina's Sweater
Last Night with Riviera
Light Sleeper
Long Pauses
Masters of Cinema
Matt Zoller Seitz
Midnight Eye
Milk Plus
Mind Jack
Movie Blog, The
Movie City Indie
Movie Hole, The
Movie Poop Shoot
New York Cool
NY Post Movie Blog
News of the Dead
No More Marriages!
Notes From Underdog
Out of Focus
Persistence of Vision
Queer Film Review
Reel Roundtable
Screen Rush
Screener (Film Journal Int.)
Screening the Past
Self-Styled Siren
Short Sheet, The
Slant Magazine
Slant Magazine Blog
Still in Motion
Stranger Song, The
They Shoot Pictures, Don't They?
Tisch Film Review
Vince Keenan
World Film (at
You Know, For Film

The Reeler Blog

Spike Lee Counsels Indies on Directing, Dentistry

Judge, jury, executioner: (L-R) Spike Lee, Al Palagonia and Bruce Meyers break down the finalists in LiveMansion's directing contest (Photo: STV)

As I acknowledged here last week, I might have been wrong to some degree about the cringeworthy horror I expected from LiveMansion: The Movie, the filmmaking-by-social-network experiment going on at its namesake site as we speak. Earlier this month the organizers hosted an audition for the film's directing job, for which five finalists tried out with short films of the same script -- each budgeted at $1,000. Spike Lee joined fellow judges Bruce Meyers and Al Palagonia in critiquing the entries; LiveMansion just recently posted the finalists' work to its site, complete with constructive (and more mildly constructive) comments from Lee and his fellow judges.

"First of all, I'd like to say that it puts me in an uncomfortable position saying who's best," Lee said at the end of the event. "The fact that that you're five out of 250 (submissions) is an accomplishment in itself. And hopefully, whether you're selected by the online audience or not, hopefully some other people will see this and this will catapult you to where you want to be and let this be a step forward. I don't see any of you guys... don't view yourselves as losers in this. And I think this is a great demonstration to the audience of how different we are as human beings. Think about it: They're all given the same budget, the same script, and we saw five different viewpoints. You saw different directorial choices that everybody made.

"And that's why we all love films. I would have been screaming if we had not only seen the same script five times, but the same exact thing five times. Thank God it wasn't that."

After the jump, follow along with Lee as he parses what it was, complete with tips for dental care and how to light black actors. (Meanwhile, John Leguizamo and Cara Buono have at the acting class here.)

DIRECTOR 1 -- Stan Arthur

ARTHUR: "Keep in mind that these are my friends pretending to be actors."

LEE: "Well, I think that you have some very interesting friends, and one lady needs to go to the dentist. But it worked for the role."

DIRECTOR 2 -- Daniel Buonsanto

LEE: "I liked it very much, and what I liked about it -- no disrespect to my man here [points to Stan Arthur] -- I think he was really trying to be too much like Quentin Tarantino. It was evident when I watched it. I didn't see that you were trying to do this like any particular director; this was more original. It wasn't like, 'This is the way Scorsese would have shot it!' Another thing, though: Don't make excuses! Before you began the film, you said, 'Well, I would have liked to have had more time...' You can't do that. I tell that to my students at NYU: When that stuff goes on the screen, (the audience) doesn't care if your dog died, your mother died, you got divorced. All that stuff is on the other side of the screen. All that matters is what ends up there. So you never get up in front of people and make an alibi. There's nothing to make an alibi for."

DIRECTOR 3 -- Richard Greenberg

LEE: "You really took advantage of production values. No one else had a vehicle, and you can see the locale. Al doesn't mean 'lack of lighting' -- it was very atmospheric. People walking in and out of the light. It was very successful."

DIRECTOR 4 -- Noah J. Ehlert

LEE: "You were the only one so far to have the guy strapped into the chair for real. Because even if you're stunned, and you're not strapped to the chair, you're going to try to haul ass. But you might have had a misstep though: In the bar, showing the USB on the keychain? Why did you want to give that away so early?"

DIRECTOR 5 -- Mitch Gettleman

LEE: "That was innovative the way you had those work lights in the scene. And then they came to great use when you swung it around and that revealed Jack. I liked your sound design. What's your D.P.'s name? Ted? When you've got a dark-skinned brother, you've gotta put some light on him! I mean, put a little bit of light. He's like... eyeballs! Just a little bit. Help the brother out!"

To view video of the judging panel, visit the event site here.

(Screen grabs from LiveMansion.)

Posted at March 27, 2007 11:48 AM

Post a comment


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Search The Reeler
Join the Mailing List

RSS Feed


Send a Tip