The Reeler

Recent Comments


A Girl and a Gun
Ain't It Cool News
Alliance of Women Film Journalists
Anne Thompson
Art Fag City
Better Than Fudge
Big Picture Big Sound
Bitter Cinema
Blank Screen
Brian Flemming
Bright Lights
Celluloid Eyes
Chutry Experiment, The
Cinema Confidential
Cinema Eye
Coming Soon
Cool Cinema Trash
Cyndi Greening
Dark Horizons
Drew's Blog-O-Rama
Esoteric Rabbit
Film Detail
Film Experience, The
Film Journal, The
Film Journey
Film Stew
Film Rotation
GreenCine Daily
Hacking Netflix
Hammer to Nail
High Sign, The
Hollywood Elsewhere
House Next Door, The
IFC Blog, The
In the Company of Glenn
IndieScene Movie Marketing Blog
indieWIRE Blogs
Jay's Movie Blog
JoBlo's Movie Emporium
Kaiju Shakedown
Like Anna Karina's Sweater
Last Night with Riviera
Light Sleeper
Long Pauses
Masters of Cinema
Matt Zoller Seitz
Midnight Eye
Milk Plus
Mind Jack
Movie Blog, The
Movie City Indie
Movie Hole, The
Movie Poop Shoot
New York Cool
NY Post Movie Blog
News of the Dead
No More Marriages!
Notes From Underdog
Out of Focus
Persistence of Vision
Queer Film Review
Reel Roundtable
Screen Rush
Screener (Film Journal Int.)
Screening the Past
Self-Styled Siren
Short Sheet, The
Slant Magazine
Slant Magazine Blog
Still in Motion
Stranger Song, The
They Shoot Pictures, Don't They?
Tisch Film Review
Vince Keenan
World Film (at
You Know, For Film

The Reeler Blog

Pride, Glory at Stake in Pride and Glory Kerfuffle

"Boiler-platey"? Edward Norton in Pride and Glory (Photo: New Line Cinema)

By S.T. VanAirsdale

A while back at Hollywood Elsewhere, Jeffrey Wells experienced a bit of a letdown following a few minutes with the trailer for Pride and Glory. Tumbleweeds and Miracle helmer Gavin O'Connor directed the thriller, which co-stars Edward Norton and Colin Farrell as brothers in law -- a pair of New York cops from a family full of them (Including Jon Voight and Noah Emmerich) -- at odds over an investigation placing them amid a deepening corruption scandal. He culled a defense from Farrell in the same item, but it evidently wasn't enough to mitigate what O'Connor felt was a bit of a misguided snub:

"It seems to me ... unfair to judge my film before you've seen it. You're summarizing the entirety of the film based on a two-minute trailer. I invite you to experience the film in its full breadth and depth, and if after that you still feel that it's boiler-platey and histrionic, I'll welcome that critique, and respect your opinion. But until then, in fairness to me as the creator of the film, it would be very much appreciated if you would reserve judgment.

"I've been trying to realize this movie for over seven years, and though an amazing experience making the film at New Line, it has now become heartbreaking, watching it get caught up in corporate maneuvering, where bookkeeping seems to take precedent over filmmaking. My film is living in some form of studio purgatory, so it hurts to read negative comments about it before its ever been released."

The "bookkeeping" to which O'Connor refers concerns New Line, in Farrell's words, having "lost the bollocks on The Golden Compass ... and they literally don't have enough money to market things" until 2009 -- the film's new release date. There's a minor controversy as well over Emmerich's casting (New Line production boss Toby Emmerich evidently resisted his brother's appearance in not only this film, but also Todd Field's Little Children), but I don't think it's impugning anyone's work to say that the trailer is a bit pekid or, as Wells put it, "boiler-platey, perhaps a little too emphatic and histrionic." I wouldn't rush to judge the film as such, however, at least no more than I'd say Pineapple Express is the second coming of Raising Arizona on the basis of probably the single funniest trailer I've ever seen. The likelihood of disappointment there is alarmingly high, just as the likelihood of, say, nuance or dynamics in a feature-length drama starring Norton, Voight and Farrell -- no matter how pitched its trailer -- is reassuringly high.

That's not being unfair, is it? Anyway, think about it -- we've got a year to discuss.

Posted at February 18, 2008 10:45 AM

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Search The Reeler
Join the Mailing List

RSS Feed


Send a Tip